Clovek se tady nauci plno novych veci. Tak jsem si ted precetela na na ang.Wikipedii;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet#Analysis_and_criticism

Prectla jsem to cely, a jaksi tv uj "problem" v tom nikde nefiguruje. Ruzni psycholgove, kritici,literati, ap se zabyvaji "co tim chtel basnik rici". Legenda o Hamletovi ocividne slouzila Shakespearovi k tomu, aby ukazal na ruzne spolecenske problemy. K nimz nepocital naky problemy dansky kralovsky rodiny za ranneho stredoveku, ale momentalni eticke problemy anglicke a jine spolecnosti.

The story of Shakespeare""s Hamlet was derived from the legend of Amleth, preserved by 13th-century chronicler Saxo Grammaticus in his Gesta Danorum, as subsequently retold by the 16th-century scholar François de Belleforest. Shakespeare may also have drawn on an earlier Elizabethan play known today as the Ur-Hamlet, though some scholars believe Shakespeare wrote the Ur-Hamlet, later revising it to create the version of Hamlet we now have. He almost certainly wrote his version of the title role for his fellow actor, Richard Burbage, the leading tragedian of Shakespeare""s time.
……… The play""s structure and depth of characterisation have inspired much critical scrutiny. One such example is the centuries-old debate about Hamlet""s hesitation to kill his uncle, which some see as merely a plot device to prolong the action but which others argue is a dramatisation of the complex philosophical and ethical issues that surround cold-blooded murder, calculated revenge, and thwarted desire. More recently, psychoanalytic critics have examined Hamlet""s unconscious desires,

Takze z toho vyvozuju, ze Shakespeare nemel na mysli popisovat danskou historii, kdo a kdy ma narok na trun, ale zabyval se moralnimi a etickymi uvahami - kdy a z jakyho duvodu je "omluvitelne" vrazdit, mstit se a jit za svym. No a k tomu se Shakespearovi hodil namet stare legendy.